Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory152.7 GB free of 160 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display6016 x 3384 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '21 at 23:15
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3245
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 74.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 264
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 1,046
93% 787 Pts
64-Core 2,609
162% 2,609 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Apple(106B 0201) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 32GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 120
Parallax 241
120% 169 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 158
Splatting 82.4
91% 115 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP4096 4TB
990GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 116.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1715 1570 1666 1807 1820 1813 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 8% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7DJR4N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA84GR7DJR4N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA84GR7DJR4N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA84GR7DJR4N-WM HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 159GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
32767, 8192, 32767, 8192, 32767, 8192, 32767, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
129% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 66.2
MC Mixed 45.9
152% 53.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 10.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 150% - Outstanding Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback