Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Professional-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Professional-M  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '21 at 02:16
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 496
66% 496 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 37.8
29% 37.9 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 27
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$38
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 204 197 204 211 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 349
Write 329
Mixed 323
SusWrite 210
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 32
106% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 199
154% 211 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 123%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 6.3 7.5 6.9 4.8 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Read 12.3
Write 4
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 5.5
8% 6.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Professional-M Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Professional-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback