| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
| Memory | 26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160512 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 08 '17 at 14:40 |
| Run Duration | 81 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
|
83%
Excellent
|
79% 138 Pts
|
66% 538 Pts
|
53% 855 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 368.39
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
18% 19.3 fps
|
16% 19.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
68.4%
Good
|
70% 24.6 GB/s
|
51% 17.9 GB/s
|
59% 67.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 6,329 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z440 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,295x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,104x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 916x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 775x |
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 393x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 228x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |