Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170 4,850 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 203 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 381 53% 394 Pts	64-Core 391 24% 391 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 431.70 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 4.5 3% 4.63 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 333GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 75 90 94 93 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 89.8 Write 73.8 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 81.9 52% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905584-023.A00LF 4x4GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.1% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 18.7 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 17.9 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM