Today's hottest deals

HP 23-g009

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 23-g009  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B06
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140218
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 30 '21 at 04:42
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 43.8
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 60.4
28% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 117
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
HP(103C 2B06) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KG480G8 480GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XCV10100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 257 362 368 363 363 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62% Good
Read 301
Write 344
Mixed 302
SusWrite 341
73% 322 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 20.9
69% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 168
126% 168 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-g009 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 23-g009

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback