Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookAir7,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookAir7,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937CB26E2E02BB01
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5650U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 166
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 217
30% 220 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 011B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 9.3
5% 6.17 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 7.4
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0512G PCIe 500GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW1JA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,250
Write 515
Mixed 506
165% 757 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 31.1
125% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 372
276% 374 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 223%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E384A544D4C41522D4E544D 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.5
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookAir7,2 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir7,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback