Today's hottest deals

Asus CM6870

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CM6870  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6870
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120224
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJan 28 '21 at 16:55
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 491
50% 403 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
49.5% Average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 83.3
52% 68.9 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 44.6
45% 56.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 184 181 166 165 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 263
Write 218
Mixed 220
SusWrite 173
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 26.9
100% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 97.2
DQ Mixed 33.1
34% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
17GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 288
Write 344
Mixed 284
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 31.5
104% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 34.1
DQ Write 65
DQ Mixed 43.3
35% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 129 136 135 133 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61% Good
Read 77.7
Write 108
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 135
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61%
Great: 90%
Multi Flash Reader 8GB
7GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 19.4
Write 13.4
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 13.6
20% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.3
164% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 12%
ST316081 5AS 160GB
54GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 57 56 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 55.4
Write 52.9
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 56.2
68% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 24%
Lexar microSD RDR 128GB
118GB free, PID b051
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 33
Write 26.7
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 26.8
38% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 4.5
310% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 14.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback