Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 04:00
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 186
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 598
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.7% Very good
Lighting 95.4
Reflection 106
Parallax 92.3
78% 97.8 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 95.2
Splatting 95.1
78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BW256H6 256GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BG21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 86 67 135 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 388
Write 271
Mixed 256
SusWrite 107
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 23.7
84% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 153
129% 189 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
644GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 135 140 88 70 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 158
Write 155
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 115
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP Adata DDR4 3000 CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.6% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 20.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback