Today's hottest deals

Asus G73Sw

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G73Sw  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G73Sw
Memory14.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110210
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 20:00
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.9% Poor
Memory 48.6
1-Core 7
2-Core 16.4
20% 24 Pts
4-Core 21.4
8-Core 22
3% 21.7 Pts
64-Core 23
1% 23 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Asus(1043 2048) 1GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.57
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 3.6
6% 6.77 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 7.5
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 170 147 228 140 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 291
Write 259
Mixed 330
SusWrite 152
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 15.4
49% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 28.7
DQ Mixed 46
31% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 133%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
681GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 19 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 20.5
Write 11.7
Mixed 15.6
SusWrite 18
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 20%
SanDisk Cruzer 2GB
0GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 12
Write 9
Mixed 5
10% 8.67 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64D0JKHNK 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 01BA 64D0JKHNK 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 9.1
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 0.8
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G73Sw Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Sw

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback