Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 7552

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 7552  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 7552
Memory2.1 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 13:30
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X920 Quad-Core
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 33.2
2-Core 66.2
36% 54.4 Pts
4-Core 36.9
8-Core 41.5
5% 39.2 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Acer(1025 0442) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 5.2
5% 5.83 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 55 66 58 63 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.3% Poor
Read 202
Write 191
Mixed 190
SusWrite 69.8
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 10.5
44% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 57.4
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 64
55% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT112S6TFR8C-H9 80CE M471B5773DH0-CH9 5GB
667, 667, 667 MHz
1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 7552 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 7552

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback