Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 195%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics182% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 UD  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 06:52
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$196
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 169
2-Core 335
108% 200 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 1,279
114% 967 Pts
64-Core 2,350
146% 2,350 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148
Gainward(10B0 2204) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (255 fps cap detected)
182% Outstanding
Lighting 255
Reflection 255
Parallax 255
208% 255 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 255
Splatting 199
190% 236 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 182%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 968 669 644 611 621 623 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,555
Write 2369
Mixed 1,703
SusWrite 689
408% 1,829 MB/s
4K Read 71.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 99.2
335% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,474
DQ Write 1,298
DQ Mixed 1,366
1,029% 1,379 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 310%
Great: 340%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
78GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 111 110 106 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63% Good
Read 110
Write 94.6
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 109
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63%
Great: 67%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
38GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 99 102 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 106
Write 92.7
Mixed 62
SusWrite 98.4
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59%
Great: 109%
Intenso External USB 3.0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 162 164 164 158 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 144
Write 149
Mixed 132
SusWrite 164
109% 147 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
421% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 62.3
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 47.4
148% 51.6 GB/s
SC Read 34.3
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 43.9
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 138%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 UD Builds (Compare 1,785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 UD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback