Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6830s

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6830s  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30E9
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111209
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '21 at 18:58
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5870
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 44.8
34% 46.6 Pts
4-Core 43.8
8-Core 40.5
6% 42.2 Pts
64-Core 43.9
3% 43.9 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430
HP(103C 30E9) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.46%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 63 105 69 59 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 203
Write 158
Mixed 160
SusWrite 68.1
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 11.7
46% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 48.3
DQ Mixed 31.8
26% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.5
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6830s Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6830s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback