| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Bytespeed BYTSPDPC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Intel DX79SI |
| Memory | 29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130806 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 16 '21 at 22:36 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.1%
Very good
|
71% 121 Pts
|
52% 424 Pts
|
40% 653 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.09
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.9%
Average
|
46% 62.7 fps
|
48% 59.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 439 441 451 450 449 MB/s
|
89.8%
Excellent
|
95% 422 MB/s
|
106% 36.4 MB/s
|
118% 193 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 0x46332D3137303030434C392D3447425A48 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
93.3%
Outstanding
|
105% 36.6 GB/s
|
38% 13.5 GB/s
|
58% 68.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical BYTSPDPC Builds (Compare 5 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Bytespeed BYTSPDPC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 2x |
| Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 2x |
| Core i7 860Intel $290Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 3x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 1x |
| HD 5750AMDBench 8%, 12,403 samples | 1x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| SSD 256GBBench 74%, 12,868 samples | 2x |
| WDBNCE0010PNC 1TBWDCBench 97%, 21,221 samples | 2x |
| A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $278 |