Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 10:23
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PRI-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5200 Dual-Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 25.5
2-Core 43.1
32% 44.1 Pts
4-Core 52
8-Core 60.9
7% 56.5 Pts
64-Core 58.3
4% 58.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 74 75 68 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 86.2
Write 82.3
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 68.4
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 88%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 64GB
53GB free, PID 007a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 2.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 10.6
10% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B2873EH1-CH9 Micron V01D3L84GB52852813 5GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $232
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback