Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive6.85% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170313
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 10:43
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 40.9
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 161
50% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 330
37% 292 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.7% Poor
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 36
Parallax 32.1
28% 34 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 35.5
Splatting 0.3
16% 22.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 11 35 13 35 34 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
6.85% Terrible
Read 37
Write 121
Mixed 15.1
SusWrite 26.9
11% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.7
6% 3.1 MB/s
DQ Read 78
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 12
18% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 6.85%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
25GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 61 64 65 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 94.2
Write 94.6
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 63.5
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GBLFU213B02 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback