Today's hottest deals

HP 255 G6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 255 G6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8330
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180725
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 07:50
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 62
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 78.4
41% 63.9 Pts
4-Core 78.5
8-Core 68.4
10% 73.4 Pts
64-Core 77.8
5% 77.8 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 8330) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 5.8
3% 4.67 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 4
Splatting 6
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT23H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 59 61 62 59 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 393
Write 219
Mixed 305
SusWrite 77.8
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 21.3
76% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 30
DQ Mixed 38.4
51% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.6
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback