PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Studio XPS 435MT (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0R849J |
Memory | 9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20091221 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 10 '21 at 15:21 |
Run Duration | 207 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58.9%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba A100 240GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 37 39 60 28 52 MB/s
|
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
459GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 84 78 77 73 MB/s
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
164GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 38 44 58 25 47 MB/s
|
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ SL 2TB
929GB free
Firmware: A905
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Generic- Compact Flash 2GB
2GB free, PID 0181
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.7 4.8 MB/s
|
2.55%
Terrible
|
|||
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
22GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 17 18 16 15 MB/s
|
9.8%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 274x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 18x |
Xeon W3580IntelBench 72%, 653 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 17x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 13x |
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $175 |