Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime15.2 Days
Run DateJan 03 '21 at 12:01
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 63.7
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 218
66% 124 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 447
60% 446 Pts
64-Core 444
27% 444 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 18.7
11% 14.7 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 12.4
9% 11 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Innovation IT 240GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0720B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 279 68 66 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 505
Write 427
Mixed 400
SusWrite 73.7
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
550GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 108 107 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 145
Write 116
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 106
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FDD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.1% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback