Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GE62 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151223
Uptime23.7 Days
Run DateJan 02 '21 at 21:52
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 201
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 544
55% 444 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
MSI(1462 115A) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9901
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 16.7
16% 19.5 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39MND-3510A 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20100P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 356 328 338 341 260 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 380
Mixed 316
SusWrite 328
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 37.5
141% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 276
222% 313 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 96%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
775GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 123 121 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 134
Write 117
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 123
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback