Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory62.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 62.5GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory58.7 GB free of 62.5 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 02:09
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5520
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 63
2-Core 120
52% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 169
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 512MB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 13.3.43368.0
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.15% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 10.5
10% 11.6 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.73 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Harddisk SSD 275GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F.X91B7W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 383 391 428 428 411 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 62GB
667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 8192, 4096, 2048, 512 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 14.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback