Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180313
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '20 at 11:19
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 155
71% 115 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 573
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41% Average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 101
Parallax 45.9
32% 61.8 fps
MRender 58.6
Gravity 75.6
Splatting 79.5
59% 71.2 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 41%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$75
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 635
Write 396
Mixed 376
103% 469 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 36.2
141% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 656
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 556
406% 536 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
5GB free
Firmware: 5.02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 179
Write 115
Mixed 132
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 20.4
86% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 125
95% 128 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 61%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
54GB free
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 85 63 55 57 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 446
Write 341
Mixed 406
SusWrite 106
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 40.9
149% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 220
200% 306 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 100 110 130 128 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 106
Write 134
Mixed 112
SusWrite 117
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.3
219% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSA.8FADG BLS4G4D240FSA.8FADG BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 23.7
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 20
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Gaming 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $540
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback