Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100714
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 22:08
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X3 720
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 41.6
2-Core 73.9
45% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 118
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 840D) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
562GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 80 79 80 65 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 80.6
Write 66.7
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 71.6
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
160% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 62%
Flash USB Disk 8GB
2GB free, PID 3a04
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.7 4.7 4.2 4.3 4.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 2.3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 4
7% 6.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA790X-UD4 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $105Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback