Today's hottest deals

D Precision 5820 Tower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemD Precision 5820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06JWJY
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 23:37
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2235
CPU0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 296
34% 268 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Graphics
Dell(1028 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1086 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.18.04
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 45.4
Parallax 36.5
17% 34.4 fps
MRender 44.9
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 34
29% 35.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1060 843 833 839 838 828 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,556
Write 2,020
Mixed 1,675
SusWrite 873
397% 1,781 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 83.1
294% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 662
495% 663 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 276%
Great: 340%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 228GB
42GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 421 425 458 458 458 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 645
Write 421
Mixed 244
SusWrite 445
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 25.2
165% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 147
146% 238 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
864GB free
Firmware: 7113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 79 80 80 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 201
Write 93.8
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 79.4
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 109%
General USB Flash Disk 125GB
23GB free, PID 8381
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 29 0.2 29 0.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 103
Write 61
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 16.6
74% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.9
301% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7CJR8N-WM 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 15.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 9.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 5820 Tower Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

System: D Precision 5820 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback