Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 20:53
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 188
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 363
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 49.9
46% 54.4 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 46
38% 46.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 52 49 50 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 445
Write 58
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 50.2
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 39.6
86% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 41.3
DQ Mixed 51.6
49% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 85%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
89GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 254 81 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 461
Write 298
Mixed 322
SusWrite 152
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 37.5
149% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 182
161% 240 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.3
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback