Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160331
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 18:43
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770S-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 94
2-Core 176
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 501
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Asus(1043 827F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 1.8
4% 3.9 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 4
5% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 611
Write 518
Mixed 386
112% 505 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 40.5
138% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 461
371% 533 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
30GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 74 76 78 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 76.1
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 69%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
28GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 3.9 3.3 3 3.7 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Read 8
Write 0.5
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 3.2
5% 4.12 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-064.A00LF 99U5471-047.A00LF 9905471-064.A00LF 99U5471-047.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback