Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro13,3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro13,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-A5C67F76ED83108C
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, , 3360 x 2100 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 19:39
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 182
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 391
43% 338 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.8% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 132
Parallax 185
104% 148 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 133
Splatting 92.3
88% 110 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256L 251GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXS6AA0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,481
Write 1,356
Mixed 863
274% 1,233 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 29.3
138% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 960
DQ Write 462
DQ Mixed 616
482% 679 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 380%
Generic Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 3
SusWrite 2.6
4% 3.45 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B3445424533303445422D45474347202020 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.6% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 20.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro13,3 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro13,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback