PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
Graphics | 32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2V (all builds) |
Memory | 3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.5 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100820 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 17 '20 at 10:55 |
Run Duration | 199 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 661-$80
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
157GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 94 103 105 107 115 MB/s
|
39.5%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 85 94 93 96 105 MB/s
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
OCZ SOLID3 60GB
21GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 52 67 57 57 MB/s
|
26.4%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$89
543GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 64 62 66 68 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
221GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 85 88 90 91 MB/s
|
43.1%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
9.1%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 53x |
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples | 28x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 20x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 32x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 11x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $85 |