Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S1  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 10:28
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 186
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 360
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Gigabyte(1458 34FE) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.88% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 8.5
8% 10.1 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 9.1
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.88%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MIXZA-120GB 120GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 232 233 237 235 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.8% Above average
Read 256
Write 232
Mixed 227
SusWrite 231
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 17.3
87% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 82.7
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 26.1
49% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
466GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 134 135 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 129
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 134
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S1 Builds (Compare 2,508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $294
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback