Today's hottest deals

LG 15ND540-GX50K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG 15ND540-GX50K  (all builds)
MotherboardLG White Tip Mountain
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150415
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateDec 14 '20 at 05:54
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 80.5
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 114
56% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 145
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1854 0213) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 4.6
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.1
2% 3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 128GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 74 72 64 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 420
Write 166
Mixed 129
SusWrite 71.9
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 22.4
86% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 87.6
DQ Write 50.3
DQ Mixed 26.1
31% 54.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 90%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
369GB free
Firmware: AM0P3L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 79 78 82 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 91.5
Write 92.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 80.9
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.1% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback