Today's hottest deals

Biostar A10N-9830E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardBiostar A10N-9830E  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 06:34
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 29.3
2-Core 81.8
38% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 130
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
AMD(1002 1CC0) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 5.2
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 3
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 61 117 91 167 209 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 358
Write 302
Mixed 272
SusWrite 138
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 8.9
50% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 90.9
DQ Mixed 36.1
45% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A10N-9830E Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A10N-9830E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $46
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $152Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback