Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8105
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 12:18
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 189
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 376
51% 379 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 8105) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.2
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ldlc F7+120GB 120GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 39 74 42 39 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 426
Write 370
Mixed 319
SusWrite 75.3
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 10.3
46% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 45.4
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 15.8
15% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 97%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$106
895GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 63.2
Write 66
Mixed 51
SusWrite 100
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback