Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H81M-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-H  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 06:48
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 119
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 590
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 86D2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.8% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 108
Parallax 111
93% 111 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 102
Splatting 94.7
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 289 293 292 292 293 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 137
Mixed 276
SusWrite 276
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 39.5
160% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 244
207% 305 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 128%
OCZ Vector 150 120GB-$89
102GB free
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 405 422 426 425 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 424
Mixed 348
SusWrite 388
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 35.5
143% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 305
239% 329 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 137 135 134 135 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 140
Write 138
Mixed 94.9
SusWrite 129
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
59.5% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-H Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-H - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback