Today's hottest deals

Asrock A520M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 23:12
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 73.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 296
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 950
95% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,116
69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Palit(1569 0FC6) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.49% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 12.3
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.49%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HAJQ-00000 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT0300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 489 490 484 495 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 486
Mixed 428
SusWrite 489
108% 477 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 60.4
203% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 369
278% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 130%
Great: 130%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
843GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 153 152 153 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 149
Mixed 124
SusWrite 152
109% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A520M-HDV Builds (Compare 783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback