Today's hottest deals

Asus AM1M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus AM1M-A  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 19:10
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3
FS1b , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.05 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 37.2
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 58.9
25% 41.3 Pts
4-Core 46.1
8-Core 81
8% 63.5 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.2
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 234 260 260 278 227 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 288
Write 277
Mixed 255
SusWrite 244
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 9.5
38% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 94.7
DQ Write 80.3
DQ Mixed 87.8
66% 87.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 119%
USB DISK Pro 16GB
6GB free, PID 3e23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 7.3 6.5 7.3 5.6 6.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
6.09% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 13.8
Mixed 10
SusWrite 7.2
15% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 1
62% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 CT51264BD160BJ.C8F 12GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 216
18% 216 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1M-A Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-A - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback