Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '17 at 22:42
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 126
56% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 207
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Lighting 83
Reflection 82.1
Parallax 73.5
68% 79.5 fps
MRender 80
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 65.3
59% 72.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-vert EX450 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 3.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 479
Write 467
Mixed 473
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 26.5
102% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 15.1
65% 150 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 103%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 387
Mixed 410
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 32.3
126% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 76.1
DQ Mixed 92.2
88% 144 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 124%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 137
Write 131
Mixed 109
159% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.28
91% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%
WDC WD10 EZEX-08M2NA0 1TB
651GB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 131
Write 95.2
Mixed 77.5
122% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.25
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 17
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3H Builds (Compare 338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback