Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3775 931 User benchmarks, average bench 32% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	31.7% Below average	Memory 50.5 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 40.4 26% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 78.7 8-Core 71.4 10% 75.1 Pts	64-Core 78.7 5% 78.7 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1A0D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.95 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.57 1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MCG8GC 63GB 366 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.11 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 161 Write 63.3 Mixed 91.1 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 4.43 40% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 37.8 DQ Write 16.1 DQ Mixed 4.5 9% 19.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 23%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 506GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 40 Write 33.8 Mixed 23.6 40% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.18 20% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1066, 1066 MHz 1024, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 159 25% 159 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM