Today's hottest deals

Intel X79M-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79M-S  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 11:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 110
50% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 340
35% 280 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 31.9
27% 32.9 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 22.9
24% 30.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$24
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 246
Mixed 227
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 18.6
78% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 29.8
56% 108 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.7% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 8.2
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79M-S Builds (Compare 604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback