| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F |
| Memory | 24.4 GB free of 32.0078 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8 |
| BIOS Date | 20130705 |
| Uptime | 55.9 Days |
| Run Date | May 10 '17 at 12:09 |
| Run Duration | 97 Seconds |
| Run User | BGR-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
|
41.5%
Average
|
37% 49.9 Pts
|
7% 47.2 Pts
|
3% 52 Pts
|
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
66.5%
Good
|
65% 89.1 MB/s
|
88% 0.83 MB/s
| |
|
|
42.4%
Average
|
50% 66.8 MB/s
|
82% 0.64 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20.2%
Poor
|
19% 6.53 GB/s
|
13% 4.47 GB/s
|
44% 90.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F Builds (Compare 39 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 8x |
| Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 7x |
| Xeon E5-2697 v2IntelBench 69%, 1,265 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 7x |
| Radeon Pro WX 3100AMDBench 14%, 1,651 samples | 5x |
| Quadro FX 3800NvidiaBench 6%, 3,739 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $798 |