PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 42.5 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110610 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 04 '20 at 17:55 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | BGR-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
|
74.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 5000
Nvidia(10DE 0770) 2.5GB
CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.11
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 218 219 216 219 217 MB/s
|
53.6%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
408GB free
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 226 223 221 221 221 MB/s
|
54.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 326x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 192x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 183x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 164x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 94x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 70x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 37x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 35x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |