Today's hottest deals

Samsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100927
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 15:27
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 43.8
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 114
41% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 139
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 74.4
5% 74.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Sanyo(144D C07F) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 107 42 46 48 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.9% Poor
Read 106
Write 151
Mixed 98.4
SusWrite 72.4
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 9.8
26% 8.33 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 115
91% 126 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 85%
Single Flash Reader 32GB
29GB free, PID 6335
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 13 14 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 15.6
Write 15.2
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 13.8
20% 15 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3
210% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1066S364L7/4G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.3
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852 Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R540/R580/R780/SA41/E452/E852

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $233Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback