Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10130

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 10130  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130904
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 00:52
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 232
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 586
65% 513 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 367D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5162
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 7.1
3% 4.53 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 78 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 79.8
Write 84.3
Mixed 47
SusWrite 77.4
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 54%
Samsung HD160HJ 160GB
130GB free
Firmware: BF100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 71 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 72
Write 77.8
Mixed 48
SusWrite 70.5
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10130 Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback