Today's hottest deals

Teclast F7 Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTeclast F7 Plus  (all builds)
MotherboardTECLAST F7 Plus
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191114
Uptime15.7 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 10:41
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 41.2
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 100
36% 63 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 91.9
16% 110 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.8
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
1% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teclast 256GB NA850-2280 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 236 60 10 59 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 385
Write 310
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 80.2
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 1.2
31% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 26.5
35% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F7 Plus Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Teclast F7 Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback