Today's hottest deals

Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H87M-PRO  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141028
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 02:14
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 170
73% 121 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 378
51% 381 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 34.2
31% 33.1 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 34.4
30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$60
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 624 625 628 630 632 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,324
Write 635
Mixed 621
SusWrite 560
174% 785 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 54.5
226% 86.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,106
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 403
367% 586 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 186%
Great: 213%
Samsung MZMPC032 32GB
21GB free
Firmware: 201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 86 86 76 73 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 322
Write 87.5
Mixed 131
SusWrite 78.3
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 16.6
71% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 33.7
DQ Mixed 60.1
58% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
112GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 108 109 109 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 112
Write 98.5
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 105
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 79%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
166GB free
Firmware: 3A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 54 54 53 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 60.3
Mixed 39
SusWrite 52.9
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 43%
StoreJet Transcend 320GB
222GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 25.2
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 25.4
35% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173CB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback