Today's hottest deals

Alienware ASM201

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAlienware ASM201  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0GWM1Y
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171207
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 21:20
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 207
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 580
57% 466 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
Dell(1028 072B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1253 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.6% Poor
Lighting 41.9
Reflection 38.9
Parallax 36.1
34% 39 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 36
Splatting 0.09
18% 24.8 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 57 50 60 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 125
Write 115
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 58.7
59% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 75%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 92 91 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 168
Write 119
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 92
150% 118 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 0.8
478% 9.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 0.6
413% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD832A.M16FJ 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.8% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASM201 Builds (Compare 303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Alienware ASM201

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback