Today's hottest deals

Packard imedia S1800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard imedia S1800  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard Veriton M275
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100401
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 18:48
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 70
37% 56.7 Pts
4-Core 60.2
8-Core 50.5
8% 55.3 Pts
64-Core 53.5
3% 53.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310
Sapphire(174B 3100) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.41
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 9 13 19 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 22.8
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 16.9
17% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S1800 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S1800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback