Today's hottest deals

Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 12:55
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 207
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 619
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 784
48% 784 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 04FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 66.6
Parallax 75.1
45% 65.5 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 57.6
Splatting 55.3
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 98 93 87 145 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 395
Mixed 388
SusWrite 154
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 53.3
176% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$130
156GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 63 69 66 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 69.4
Write 65.1
Mixed 29
SusWrite 68.9
42% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
84GB free
Firmware: M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 45 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 43.2
Write 17.4
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 45.7
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 44%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
26GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 58 56 59 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45% Average
Read 98.6
Write 80.7
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 58
55% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45%
Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion+ 2TB
776GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 30.2
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 19.7
20% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 68%
Sony QD-G64E 60GB
28GB free, PID 0c55
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 30.5
Write 23.5
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 15
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 6.1
432% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB
3 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 28.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,048
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback