Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20ARS3JD00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20ARS3JD00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ARS3JD00
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 09:36
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 114
50% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 168
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.57
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 4.12
2% 3.45 fps
MRender 3.81
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 5.17
3% 3.59 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Golden MEMORY-240GB 240GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 218 7.5 70 5.7 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 398
Write 344
Mixed 276
SusWrite 53.2
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ8416E6MB-GN-F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20ARS3JD00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20ARS3JD00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback