Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 02:29
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 67
2-Core 125
52% 87 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 63.1
41% 48.6 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 50.2
Splatting 40.7
34% 40.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 479GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 64 65 62 71 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 4
Write 120
Mixed 201
SusWrite 70.5
77% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0
688% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 267%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
13GB free
Firmware: 19.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 13 19 28 13 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 54.7
Write 43
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 18.6
29% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 69%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
3GB free, PID 007a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.2 5.2 5.2 5 4.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 1
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5
8% 7.95 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.7
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback