Today's hottest deals

Dell Vostro 200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Vostro 200  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0CU409
Memory3.2 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080920
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 19:51
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 30
2-Core 59.8
37% 53.3 Pts
4-Core 59.6
8-Core 59.5
8% 59.5 Pts
64-Core 60.1
4% 60.1 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R5 230
Sapphire(174B A01D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1003
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 2
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$40
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 203 198 172 139 141 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.6% Above average
Read 209
Write 229
Mixed 207
SusWrite 175
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 29.8
100% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 81.4
DQ Mixed 36.1
33% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
836GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 152 160 160 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 161
Mixed 86
SusWrite 158
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
247% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
800GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 129 155 167 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 172
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 147
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vostro 200 Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback