Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z170 Pro4S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z170 Pro4S  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160413
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 16 '20 at 19:30
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 546
74% 552 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 43.7
Reflection 42
Parallax 40.2
36% 42 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 34.3
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 505
Write 484
Mixed 391
102% 460 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 65.4
227% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
477GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 479 478 493 491 494 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 493
Mixed 452
SusWrite 483
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 65.4
233% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 363
273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 139%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL15-17-17 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 31.4
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 32.5
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Pro4S Builds (Compare 905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Pro4S - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback